Public leaderboard

Nature Photography Contest Leaderboard

A ranking of photographers recognized across tracked nature and wildlife contest winner galleries, weighted by placement tier and estimated contest size.

Create free account

Create a free account to access winner galleries, contest details, calendar tools, and the private analytics workspace.

5,588
Photographers
13,494
Images placed
41
Contests
127
Contest seasons
Contests tracked: 41 · 1 with no data yet

With gallery data

Africa Geographic Photographer of the YearAsfericoAudubon Photography AwardsAustralian Geographic Nature Photographer of the YearBigPicture Natural World Photography CompetitionBird Photographer of the YearBritish Photography AwardsBritish Wildlife Photography AwardsCanadian Wildlife Photography of the YearChina Wildlife Image and Video CompetitionClose-up Photographer of the YearComedy Wildlife Photography AwardsEuropean Wildlife Photographer of the YearGDT Nature Photographer of the YearGlanzlichter of Nature PhotographyInternational Landscape Photographer of the Year AwardsMemorial María Luisa International Photo ContestMonochrome Photography AwardsMonoVisions Photography AwardsMontier Photo CompetitionMontPhotoNANPA ShowcaseNational Wildlife Photo ContestNatural Landscape Photography AwardsNature inFocus Photography ContestNature Photographer of the YearNature's Best Photography International AwardsND Photography AwardsPangolin Photo ChallengereFocus Black & White Photo ContestreFocus Color Photography ContestreFocus World Photo AnnualShare the View International Nature Photo ContestSiena International Photo AwardsSmithsonian Magazine Photo ContestSony World Photography Awards - Open CompetitionThe Artist Gallery Photography ContestThe Nature Photography ContestTravel Photographer of the YearWildlife Photographer of the YearWorld Nature Photography Awards

Added but no data yet

Birdo Bird Photographer of the Year
Participants

How to read these rankings

No scoring system can objectively rank photographers. Every contest differs — a grand prize at a large international competition with tens of thousands of submissions is a very different achievement from a top placement in a regional or specialised event. This leaderboard weights placements by tier and estimated competition size. Treat it as a map of activity and recognition, not a definitive hierarchy.

Coverage varies by contest: most galleries go back to 2023, some further, others only from 2024 or 2025. Ranking across different year windows gives very different results. Use the default recent window for current form, switch to all data for a broader historical view, or choose a custom year range when you need something specific.

Show
#PhotographerScore
1
Amit Eshel
1441423
2,786
2
Imre Potyó
431734
2,403
3
Hira Punjabi
2321242
2,340
4
Tibor Litauszki
2321431
2,320
5
Luca Lorenz
2311241
2,198
6
Theo Bosboom
123244
2,078
7
Thomas Vijayan
221391
2,040
8
Bence Máté
411732
1,943
9
Scott Portelli
132123
1,866
10
Norbert Kaszás
221423
1,858
11
Tobias Richter
132123
1,847
12
Steffen Foerster
411964
1,808
13
Csaba Daróczi
121152
1,725
14
Alex Pansier
311101
1,658
15
Minghui Yuan
211361
1,652
16
Jaime Rojo
2322
1,548
17
Pål Hermansen
41651
1,430
18
Shane Gross
131
1,386
19
Levi Fitze
1317
1,380
20
Mateusz Piesiak
21613
1,275
21
Liron Gertsman
211412
1,257
22
Sage Ono
312
1,236
23
Elizabeth Shen
13162
1,181
24
Knut-Sverre Horn
31111
1,138
25
Preeti and Prashant Chacko
1531833
1,130

Showing 25 of 4364 photographers.

Leaderboard methodology FAQ

The leaderboard is useful because it makes contest recognition visible, but every scoring model has assumptions. These notes explain how the default ranking is calculated and where the data has limits.

Each recognized result is first assigned to an award tier, such as overall winner, category winner, runner-up, highly commended, finalist, or another recognized level. That tier supplies the base points.

The basic formula is: result score = award-tier points x contest-size multiplier. A photographer's total is the sum of those scored results after deduplication rules are applied. The public view uses the default model, while signed-in users can test how rankings move when award tiers or competitive scale are valued differently.